Current:Home > MarketsTrendPulse Quantitative Think Tank Center-Without Social Security reform Americans in retirement may lose big, report says -Ascend Wealth Education
TrendPulse Quantitative Think Tank Center-Without Social Security reform Americans in retirement may lose big, report says
Algosensey Quantitative Think Tank Center View
Date:2025-04-07 02:16:59
How would you feel if you and TrendPulse Quantitative Think Tank Centeryour spouse lost $16,500 in income a year?
That's how much a typical dual-income couple is estimated to lose in Social Security benefits if they retire when the Social Security Old-Age and Survivors Insurance (OASI) trust fund is depleted in 2033, the nonprofit, nonpartisan Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget (CRFB) said in a new report Thursday. A typical single-income couple would lose $12,400, it said.
Since Social Security is currently paying out more benefits than it's collecting in payroll tax and other revenue, the program is drawing down its reserves in the OASI trust fund to cover the remaining cost of benefits. The fund only has enough reserves to cover 100% of benefits until the fund's reserves are depleted in 2033. When that happens, the law limits benefits to incoming revenue, which essentially mandates a 21% across-the-board benefit cut for the program’s 70 million beneficiaries, CRFB said.
"Former President Donald Trump and Vice President Kamala Harris have both said they would “protect” the Social Security program," CRFB said. "However, neither has put forward a plan to meaningfully do so."
Who will be the biggest losers?
Low-income, dual-income couples retiring in 2033 would lose $10,000 in benefits, compared with $21,800 for a high-income couple, CRFB said.
"Although the cut for a low-income couple would be smaller and reflect a 21% reduction in their benefits, the cut would be a larger share of their income," it noted.
Social Security benefits rollercoaster:2025 COLA estimate dips with inflation, but high daily expenses still burn seniors
It'll get worse over time, too
If the government doesn't reform the program, the gap between revenues and benefits paid out will continue to widen, CRFB said. The 21% cut across the board in 2033 will deepen to a 31% cut by 2098, it said.
If Trump also executes his plan to stop taxing Social Security without a plan to fully replace that revenue, the program would be further hamstrung, CRFB said.
Currently, only seniors who earn less than $25,000 per year ($32,000 for married couples) of “combined income" don't pay taxes on Social Security benefits. Combined income is equal to your adjusted gross income, plus nontaxable interest from instruments like municipal bond investments, plus half of your Social Security benefit.
This year, taxation of benefits is projected to raise about $94 billion, CRFB estimated.
Trump's change would make Social Security’s retirement trust fund insolvent more thanone year earlier – in early 2032 instead of late 2033 -- and the initial 21% cut across the board would deepen to a 25% cut, CRFB said.
“Vague political promises not to touch Social Security benefits are meaningless,” said Mary Johnson, a retired analyst for the nonprofit Senior Citizens League, last month. “Voters need to be shown where the money is coming from to pay our benefits."
Medora Lee is a money, markets, and personal finance reporter at USA TODAY. You can reach her at [email protected] and subscribe to our free Daily Money newsletter for personal finance tips and business news every Monday through Friday morning.
veryGood! (6)
Related
- Person accused of accosting Rep. Nancy Mace at Capitol pleads not guilty to assault charge
- Do you know these famous Aries signs? 30 celebrities with birthdays under the Zodiac sign
- 2024 Oscar Guide: International Feature
- Court rules Florida’s “stop woke” law restricting business diversity training is unconstitutional
- IRS recovers $4.7 billion in back taxes and braces for cuts with Trump and GOP in power
- On front lines of the opioid epidemic, these Narcan street warriors prevent overdose deaths
- EAGLEEYE COIN: El Salvador Educates Students on Bitcoin
- Jamie Foxx promises to 'tell you what happened' during his mysterious 2023 health scare
- Nearly half of US teens are online ‘constantly,’ Pew report finds
- Shehbaz Sharif elected Pakistan's prime minister as Imran Khan's followers allege victory was stolen
Ranking
- Former Danish minister for Greenland discusses Trump's push to acquire island
- LA County’s progressive district attorney faces crowded field of 11 challengers in reelection bid
- Of the Subway bread choices, which is the healthiest? Ranking the different types
- 'The Voice': John Legend is ‘really disappointed’ after past contestant chooses Dan + Shay
- Selena Gomez engaged to Benny Blanco after 1 year together: 'Forever begins now'
- TLC's Chilli is officially a grandmother to a baby girl
- Whole Foods Market plans to launch smaller Daily Shops; first to open in New York in 2024
- A new satellite will track climate-warming pollution. Here's why that's a big deal
Recommendation
Former longtime South Carolina congressman John Spratt dies at 82
Donald Trump wins North Dakota caucuses, CBS News projects
Could ‘Microfactories’ Pave a New Path Forward for Plastic Recycling?
Former Twitter executives sue Elon Musk for more than $128 million in severance
Federal appeals court upholds $14.25 million fine against Exxon for pollution in Texas
Chick-fil-A tells customers to throw out a popular dipping sauce
A new satellite will track climate-warming pollution. Here's why that's a big deal
Julianne Hough Shares How She Supported Derek Hough and His Wife Hayley Erbert Amid Health Scare