Current:Home > MyNew rule strengthening federal job protections could counter Trump promises to remake the government -Ascend Wealth Education
New rule strengthening federal job protections could counter Trump promises to remake the government
View
Date:2025-04-14 07:51:24
WASHINGTON (AP) — The government’s chief human resources agency issued a new rule on Thursday making it harder to fire thousands of federal employees, hoping to head off former President Donald Trump ‘s promises to radically remake the workforce along ideological lines if he wins back the White House in November.
The Office of Personnel Management regulations will bar career civil servants from being reclassified as political appointees, or as other at-will workers, who are more easily dismissed from their jobs. It comes in response to “Schedule F,” an executive order Trump issued in 2020 that sought to allow for reclassifying tens of thousands of the 2.2 million federal employees and thus reduce their job security protections.
President Joe Biden nullified Schedule F upon taking office. But if Trump were to revive it during a second administration, he could dramatically increase the around 4,000 federal employees who are considered political appointees and typically change with each new president.
How many employees might have been affected by Schedule F is unclear. However, the National Treasury Employee Union used freedom of information requests to obtain documents suggesting that federal workers such as office managers and specialists in human resources and cybersecurity might have been subject to reclassification — meaning that the scope of Trump’s order might have been broader than previously believed.
The new rule could counter a future Schedule F order by spelling out procedural requirements for reclassifying federal employees, and clarifying that civil service protections accrued by employees can’t be taken away regardless of job type. It also makes clear that policymaking classifications apply to noncareer, political appointments and can’t be applied to career civil servants.
“It will now be much harder for any president to arbitrarily remove the nonpartisan professionals who staff our federal agencies just to make room for hand-picked partisan loyalists,” National Treasury Employees Union President Doreen Greenwald said in a statement.
Good government groups and liberal think tanks and activists have cheered the rule. They viewed cementing federal worker protections as a top priority given that replacing existing government employees with new, more conservative alternatives is a key piece of the conservative Heritage Foundation’s nearly 1,000-page playbook known as “ Project 2025.”
That plan calls for vetting and potentially firing scores of federal workers and recruiting conservative replacements to wipe out what leading Republicans have long decried as the “deep state” governmental bureaucracy.
Skye Perryman, president and CEO of Democracy Forward, which has led a coalition of nearly 30 advocacy organizations supporting the rule, called it “extraordinarily strong” and said it can effectively counter the “highly resourced, anti-democratic groups” behind Project 2025.
“This is not a wonky issue, even though it may be billed that way at times,” Perryman said. “This is really foundational to how we can ensure that the government delivers for people and, for us, that’s what a democracy is about.”
The final rule, which runs to 237 pages, is being published in the federal registry and set to formally take effect next month. The Office of Personnel Management first proposed the changes last November, then reviewed and responded to 4,000-plus public comments on them. Officials at some top conservative organizations were among those opposing the new rule, but around two-thirds of the comments were supportive.
If Trump wins another term, his administration could direct the Office of Personnel Management to draft new rules. But the process takes months and requires detailed explanation on why new regulations would be improvements — potentially allowing for legal challenges to be brought by opponents.
Rob Shriver, deputy director of the Office of Personnel Management, said the new rule ensures that federal employee protections “cannot be erased by a technical, HR process” which he said “Schedule F sought to do.”
“This rule is about making sure the American public can continue to count on federal workers to apply their skills and expertise in carrying out their jobs, no matter their personal political beliefs,” Shriver said on a call with reporters.
He noted that 85% of federal workers are based outside the Washington area and are “our friends, neighbors and family members,” who are “dedicated to serving the American people, not political agendas.”
veryGood! (49764)
Related
- $73.5M beach replenishment project starts in January at Jersey Shore
- Offense galore: Record night for offensive players at 2024 NFL draft; QB record also tied
- Lori Loughlin Says She's Strong, Grateful in First Major Interview Since College Scandal
- Harvey Weinstein's conviction tossed in stunning reversal. What does it mean for #MeToo?
- Elon Musk's skyrocketing net worth: He's the first person with over $400 billion
- O.J. Simpson's Cause of Death Revealed
- Provost at Missouri university appointed new Indiana State University president, school says
- Sophia Bush comes out as queer, confirms relationship with Ashlyn Harris
- Federal appeals court upholds $14.25 million fine against Exxon for pollution in Texas
- In-home caregivers face increased financial distress despite state program
Ranking
- Whoopi Goldberg is delightfully vile as Miss Hannigan in ‘Annie’ stage return
- Will There Be Less Wind to Fuel Wind Energy?
- NFL draft's most questionable picks in first round: QBs Michael Penix Jr., Bo Nix lead way
- 'You think we're all stupid?' IndyCar reacts to Team Penske's rules violations
- Highlights from Trump’s interview with Time magazine
- They say don’t leave valuables in parked cars in San Francisco. Rep. Adam Schiff didn’t listen
- Harvey Weinstein due back in court as a key witness weighs whether to testify at a retrial
- TikTok could soon be sold. Here's how much it's worth and who could buy it.
Recommendation
Federal court filings allege official committed perjury in lawsuit tied to Louisiana grain terminal
They say don’t leave valuables in parked cars in San Francisco. Rep. Adam Schiff didn’t listen
Kansas murder suspect uses wife's life insurance payout to buy a sex doll
Jury in Abu Ghraib trial says it is deadlocked; judge orders deliberations to resume
A South Texas lawmaker’s 15
Oregon man sentenced to 50 years in the 1978 killing of a teenage girl in Alaska
These are the countries where TikTok is already banned
A rover captures images of 'spiders' on Mars in Inca City. But what is it, really?